Natural Law

malefemale (2)

I was quite surprised at Ryan Sorba’s rebuke of CPAC.  I was not surprised by the hateful audience that judged him.  Their words are hurtful.  They are judging him.  Why must they shout down his opinion… unless they are one of the many automatons coming out of the universities now-a-days who believe that there should not be freedom of speech.  When a position cannot be defended rationally, just scream louder… but that is argument ad baculum.

We may not agree with his ethos, but we cannot argue with his logic; Or, please give an argument from reason, not emotion.  Male and Female distinctions are probably the best example of natural law.  This was common-place thinking with the Founding Fathers, “…laws of nature and of nature’s God…”  But this then points to an objective and timeless standard, something #liberallogic must categorically dismiss.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s